9 years in the megapixel race - noise or quality

Róbert Irházy (Birdie) - February 4, 2009. 14:00 (CET)

Kattintson ide a magyar változatért

10×15 cm prints

Although the viewing distance of 10×15 cm images is smaller, than that of an A4 sized or larger print, these prints don't need more than 2-3 million pixels of data. At 300 dpi we need a 1770×1180 pixel (keeping a 3:2 ratio) image to cover that paper size. This is roughly 2 megapixel.
Unfortunately digital cameras use a so called Bayer mosaic filter system to produce color image from a monochrome sensor, so an image coming from a 2 megapixel camera will seem less sharp, than a downsized and sharpened 4 megapixel image.

Will the 10-14 megapixel camera have any advantage over the 3-4 megapixel models in such smal prints? Or it is an overkill to use such high resolutions for 10×15 cm prints?
To get the answer we downsized the images using IrfanView to 3 megapixel, than applied a sharpening (value 6) in the same software.
The G1 with it's 3 megapixel native resolution has a disadvantage here, but this happens all the time when prints are made from that resolution images.

3 Mpixelre leméretezett 1. kivágás

ISO50
ISO50 RAW
ISO100
ISO100 RAW
ISO200
ISO200 RAW
ISO400
ISO400 RAW
ISO50
ISO50 RAW
ISO100
ISO100 RAW
ISO200
ISO200 RAW
ISO400
ISO400 RAW
ISO50
ISO50 RAW
ISO100
ISO100 RAW
ISO200
ISO200 RAW
ISO400
ISO400 RAW
ISO50
ISO50 RAW
ISO100
ISO100 RAW
ISO200
ISO200 RAW
ISO400
ISO400 RAW
ISO50
ISO50 RAW
ISO100
ISO100 RAW
ISO200
ISO200 RAW
ISO400
ISO400 RAW
ISO80
ISO100
ISO200
ISO400
ISO800
ISO1600
ISO80
ISO80 RAW
ISO100
ISO100 RAW
ISO200
ISO200 RAW
ISO400
ISO400 RAW
ISO800
ISO800 RAW
ISO1600
ISO1600 RAW
ISO80
ISO80 RAW
ISO100
ISO100 RAW
ISO200
ISO200 RAW
ISO400
ISO400 RAW
ISO800
ISO800 RAW
ISO1600
ISO1600 RAW

3 Mpixelre leméretezett 2. kivágás

ISO50
ISO50 RAW
ISO100
ISO100 RAW
ISO200
ISO200 RAW
ISO400
ISO400 RAW
ISO50
ISO50 RAW
ISO100
ISO100 RAW
ISO200
ISO200 RAW
ISO400
ISO400 RAW
ISO50
ISO50 RAW
ISO100
ISO100 RAW
ISO200
ISO200 RAW
ISO400
ISO400 RAW
ISO50
ISO50 RAW
ISO100
ISO100 RAW
ISO200
ISO200 RAW
ISO400
ISO400 RAW
ISO50
ISO50 RAW
ISO100
ISO100 RAW
ISO200
ISO200 RAW
ISO400
ISO400 RAW
ISO80
ISO100
ISO200
ISO400
ISO800
ISO1600
ISO80
ISO80 RAW
ISO100
ISO100 RAW
ISO200
ISO200 RAW
ISO400
ISO400 RAW
ISO800
ISO800 RAW
ISO1600
ISO1600 RAW
ISO80
ISO80 RAW
ISO100
ISO100 RAW
ISO200
ISO200 RAW
ISO400
ISO400 RAW
ISO800
ISO800 RAW
ISO1600
ISO1600 RAW

3 Mpixelre leméretezett 2. kivágás

ISO50
ISO50 RAW
ISO100
ISO100 RAW
ISO200
ISO200 RAW
ISO400
ISO400 RAW
ISO50
ISO50 RAW
ISO100
ISO100 RAW
ISO200
ISO200 RAW
ISO400
ISO400 RAW
ISO50
ISO50 RAW
ISO100
ISO100 RAW
ISO200
ISO200 RAW
ISO400
ISO400 RAW
ISO50
ISO50 RAW
ISO100
ISO100 RAW
ISO200
ISO200 RAW
ISO400
ISO400 RAW
ISO50
ISO50 RAW
ISO100
ISO100 RAW
ISO200
ISO200 RAW
ISO400
ISO400 RAW
ISO80
ISO100
ISO200
ISO400
ISO800
ISO1600
ISO80
ISO80 RAW
ISO100
ISO100 RAW
ISO200
ISO200 RAW
ISO400
ISO400 RAW
ISO800
ISO800 RAW
ISO1600
ISO1600 RAW
ISO80
ISO80 RAW
ISO100
ISO100 RAW
ISO200
ISO200 RAW
ISO400
ISO400 RAW
ISO800
ISO800 RAW
ISO1600
ISO1600 RAW

3 Mpixelre leméretezett 1. kivágás

ISO50
ISO50 RAW
ISO100
ISO100 RAW
ISO200
ISO200 RAW
ISO400
ISO400 RAW
ISO50
ISO50 RAW
ISO100
ISO100 RAW
ISO200
ISO200 RAW
ISO400
ISO400 RAW
ISO50
ISO50 RAW
ISO100
ISO100 RAW
ISO200
ISO200 RAW
ISO400
ISO400 RAW
ISO50
ISO50 RAW
ISO100
ISO100 RAW
ISO200
ISO200 RAW
ISO400
ISO400 RAW
ISO50
ISO50 RAW
ISO100
ISO100 RAW
ISO200
ISO200 RAW
ISO400
ISO400 RAW
ISO80
ISO100
ISO200
ISO400
ISO800
ISO1600
ISO80
ISO80 RAW
ISO100
ISO100 RAW
ISO200
ISO200 RAW
ISO400
ISO400 RAW
ISO800
ISO800 RAW
ISO1600
ISO1600 RAW
ISO80
ISO80 RAW
ISO100
ISO100 RAW
ISO200
ISO200 RAW
ISO400
ISO400 RAW
ISO800
ISO800 RAW
ISO1600
ISO1600 RAW
Looking at the above images we can say, that above 10 megapixel (G7) it is hard to distinguish between the images. Up to that resolution, the more original pixels we have, the more detail we will see on the downsampled and printed image.
Let's see the image noise. We have seen that higher resolution has obvious advantages at larger prints, but what can we expect from 10×15 cm prints?
The situation is very similar. The higher the resolution, the smaller the noise spots will be on the image. The case becomes a bit confusing at the G7, since a new noise filtering system steps in in that model to achieve homogenous, noise free areas. This allows us to print perfect images even from images taken at ISO 400 sensitivity.

We shouldn't forget, that we are again looking at an enlarged area. The 400 pixels wide area we see above will be about 3 cm on the printed image.

So if this print size is the target, resolutions above 7-10 megapixel have no visible advantage over lower resolution images.

First look: Panasonic DMC-FZ18 preview

Manufacturers are predictable at most of the times. The replacement of a camera usually comes 10-12 months after it's announcement, while it is very rare that a camera is replaced after only 5 months. While the new Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ18 is officially not a replacement model of the DMC-FZ8, this latter model has to get an eye catching price tag to survive the in house competition.


Nikon D40X image samples

We have uploaded the first 15 images taken with the brand new Nikon D40X and the Nikkor AF-S 55-200 mm F4-5.6 ED DX VR lens.

     

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ8 image samples

See how the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ8 has performed on our tests. Our first test images are online. Detailed review is to follow soon.

     

Review: Dust removal systems / sensor cleaning

Sensor cleaning is becoming a standard feature on modern digital SLR cameras. While the manufacturers may use different techniques to get rid of the dust from the image sensor, they all promise clean, dust free images. Do they all work equally well? Can we throw our air blower away? We have tested the four different types of sensor cleaning technologies to see which one will most likely to fulfill the expectations.


Review: Fade resistance test

Do you want your grandchildren to sit around you and see your nice, old, color photographs in fifty years from now? If so, you better watch how you get those digital images printed. While some printer manufacturers promise that the photos will last for over 100, in some case 200 years, don't forget to read the footnotes. Those numbers are usually guarantied only when the prints are stored in albums locked away from sun, heat and air. Since we don't have 200 years to test which prints will last for as long as the manufacturer promises we did a not so scientific, but very demonstrative test to find out which printing technology is the winner these days.