9 years in the megapixel race - noise or quality

Róbert Irházy (Birdie) - February 4, 2009. 14:00 (CET)
Those who were following the digital camera business in the last couple of years are probably familiar with the megapixel race phrase. Manufacturers have been increasing the resolutions like crazy because higher numbers attract more customers, while we knew that a 10×15 cm print consists of no more than 2 megapixels when printed in a lab. And most of the images are never printed in larger size. Is it really just a race driven by the marketing departments, or we really get more out of a high res camera? We have compared 8 cameras from 3 to 15 megapixels to find out.

Kattintson ide a magyar változatért

The PowerShot G line from Canon

The question is: does the increase of the resolution do any good to us, if so when? To get an answer we dig up cameras with different resolution between 1 and 15 megapixels. Looking through the compact cameras manufactured in the last 10 years, it isn't an easy task. Why? It is important to get the best possible quality at the given resolution, and it comes handy if the camera can save the images in RAW format. These requirements puts all the entry level cameras off of our list.
Although several manufacturers have produced very good bridge cameras, Canon's PowerShot G series seems to be the only suitable line. It has been updated nearly every year in the last decade, while it can represent almost all of the major megapixel milestones.

G1 G2 G3 G5 G6 G7 G9 G10
Announcement 2000-09-18 2001-08-17 2002-09-19 2003-06-02 2004-08-19 2006-09-14 2007-08-20 2008-09-17
Image size 2048 × 1536 2272 × 1704 2272 × 1704 2592 × 1944 3072 × 2304 3648 × 2736 4000 × 3000 4416 × 3312
Resolution (Mpx) 3.1 3.9 3.9 5.0 7.1 10.0 12.4 14.7
Sensor size 1/1,8" 1/1,8" 1/1,8" 1/1,8" 1/1,8" 1/1,8" 1/1,7" 1/1,7"
ISO range 50 / 100 / 200 / 400 50 / 100 / 200 / 400 50 / 100 / 200 / 400 50 / 100 / 200 / 400 50 / 100 / 200 / 400 80 / 100 / 200 / 400 / 800 / 1600 80 / 100 / 200 / 400 / 800 / 1600 / 3200* 80 / 100 / 200 / 400 / 800 / 1600 / 3200*
Focus distance 34 × 102 mm (3×) 34 × 102 mm (3×) 35 × 140 mm (4×) 35 × 140 mm (4×) 35 × 140 mm (4×) 35 × 210 mm (6×) 35 × 210 mm (6×) 28 × 140 mm (5×)
Lens speed f/2.0 × f/2.5 f/2.0 × f/2.5 f/2.0 × f/3.0 f/2.0 × f/3.0 f/2.0 × f/3.0 f/2.8 × f/4.8 f/2.8 × f/4.8 f/2.8 × f/4.5
The project started to form a shape. Since all modells were out of production for years now, except the G10, it wasn't an easy task to get them all, but thanks to very helpful Fotózz.hu users and a local dealer (DigitCam), we managed to get all 8 members of the G series.

Canon PowerShot G1
Canon PowerShot G2
Canon PowerShot G3
Canon PowerShot G5
Canon PowerShot G6
Canon PowerShot G7
Canon PowerShot G9
Canon PowerShot G10
After charging all the batteries, we had started the test.
We set the following tasks for ourselves:
  • We take one shot (RAW+JPEG) of our standard target with all cameras in all ISO sensitivity stops.
  • Display and examine the image quality through 4 cropped parts of each image in native, 18 megapixel (to simulate A3 sized prints) and 3 megapixel (for 10×15 cm or 4×6" prints) size
  • Print A3 sized photos of each image (we actually did crops, so we only needed to have 10×15 cm size prints, what made life easier and cheaper)
  • Print 10×15 cm photos of each image
  • Ask professional, amateur and beginner photographers to evaluate the prints based on color tone, resolution and noise (10 best and 10 worst)
It was a very interesting experience to handle all these cameras at once. It seemed like a trip in time. Some of the old cameras, that were top of their class back than, are now extremely odd.
Let's see the PowerShot G1 as an example. After turning it on, it does nothing for 2 seconds, than it takes another 3 seconds to fully push the lens barrels out of the camera body and become available for shooting.
We have to say, that it was very inconvenient to use all those small LCD monitors, compared to the 2.5" or larger displays on the newer models. I remember how we commented during the years, when the enlarged LCD was the major update on a new camera. Now we can appreciate that very well (along the raise of the LCD resolution).
We didn't see so significant improvement in ergonomics, though. The most comfortable camera to me was the G6, due to its decent grip and ideally positioned mode dial. But none of the cameras can beat the G10 when it comes to user interface. We get dedicated exposure compensation dial, ISO sensitivity dial, rear dial, pre-programmed navigation and function buttons, that make photography lot easier and a lot more fun. The 3" LCD with the 461K subpixel resolution is another feature that we have to mention.
All in all, we have to admit that the cameras on have improved a lot during these 9 years.

Let's now see the results of our tests, starting with the images in native resolution.

First look: Panasonic DMC-FZ18 preview

Manufacturers are predictable at most of the times. The replacement of a camera usually comes 10-12 months after it's announcement, while it is very rare that a camera is replaced after only 5 months. While the new Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ18 is officially not a replacement model of the DMC-FZ8, this latter model has to get an eye catching price tag to survive the in house competition.


Nikon D40X image samples

We have uploaded the first 15 images taken with the brand new Nikon D40X and the Nikkor AF-S 55-200 mm F4-5.6 ED DX VR lens.

     

Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ8 image samples

See how the Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ8 has performed on our tests. Our first test images are online. Detailed review is to follow soon.

     

Review: Dust removal systems / sensor cleaning

Sensor cleaning is becoming a standard feature on modern digital SLR cameras. While the manufacturers may use different techniques to get rid of the dust from the image sensor, they all promise clean, dust free images. Do they all work equally well? Can we throw our air blower away? We have tested the four different types of sensor cleaning technologies to see which one will most likely to fulfill the expectations.


Review: Fade resistance test

Do you want your grandchildren to sit around you and see your nice, old, color photographs in fifty years from now? If so, you better watch how you get those digital images printed. While some printer manufacturers promise that the photos will last for over 100, in some case 200 years, don't forget to read the footnotes. Those numbers are usually guarantied only when the prints are stored in albums locked away from sun, heat and air. Since we don't have 200 years to test which prints will last for as long as the manufacturer promises we did a not so scientific, but very demonstrative test to find out which printing technology is the winner these days.